Judge Blocks Biden’s Healthcare Worker Vaccination Mandate in Ten States; Cites “Lack of Evidence” Status Has Impact On Spreading COVID

Judge Matthew Schelp labeled the mandate “arbitrary and capricious,” arguing that there remains a “lack
of evidence” showing that vaccination status has a direct impact on spreading COVID” and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid did not get approval from Congress to mandate vaccinations for health care workers. File photo: ShutterStock.com, licensed.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Monday, a federal judge temporarily blocked a vaccination mandate imposed by the administration of President Joe Biden on healthcare workers in ten states, dealing a significant blow to the White House as more legal challenges to the mandate pile up.

The states in question have sued the Biden Administration, claiming that the vaccination mandate had violated the U.S. Constitution, and that mandate’s economic costs are overwhelming.

Judge Matthew Schelp of the Eastern District of Missouri – an appointee of former President Donald Trump – issued a preliminary injunction against the mandate, saying if carried out it would impose a burden on “the ability of healthcare facilities to provide proper care, and thus, save lives.”


Big Tech is using a content filtering system for online censorship. Watch our short video about NewsGuard to learn how they control the narrative for the Lamestream Media and help keep you in the dark. NewsGuard works with Big-Tech to make it harder for you to find certain content they feel is 'missing context' or stories their editors deem "not in your best interest" - regardless of whether they are true and/or factually accurate. They also work with payment processors and ad-networks to cut off revenue streams to publications they rate poorly by their same bias standards. This should be criminal in America. You can bypass this third-world nonsense by signing up for featured stories by email and get the good stuff delivered right to your inbox.

In addition, Schelp stated that his ruling would restore trust in the public, because it, “would ensure that federal agencies do not extend their power beyond the express delegation from Congress.”

The mandate applied to employees at Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) healthcare facilities in the states of Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, New Hampshire, Nebraska, Wyoming, and North and South Dakota; employees are supposed to have the first dose of a vaccine before December 6 and their second shot by January 4.

The requirement would have applied to over 17 million workers in approximately 76,000 health care facilities and home health care providers.

Schelp also described the mandate as being “arbitrary and capricious,” and argued that CMS “lacks evidence showing that vaccination status has a direct impact on spreading COVID” in the health care facilities that the mandate would have covered.

“No one questions that protecting patients and health care workers from contracting COVID is a laudable objective,” Schelp said in his ruling. “But the court cannot, in good faith, allow CMS to enact an unprecedented mandate that lacks a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.’”

Judge Matthew Schelp of the Eastern District of Missouri

Biden has issued various mandates to get more Americans vaccinated against COVID-19, but has suffered legal setbacks along the way; most recently, a judge temporarily blocked the White House’s mandate that that private businesses with over 100 employees require workers to be vaccinated, with an option to opt-out for weekly testing.

Nationally, 59 percent of U.S. residents are fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and 70 percent have received at least one dose.

Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to corrections@publishedreporter.com and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)