SARS-CoV-2 Bayesian Analysis by Steven Carl Quay MD Phd


A Bayesian analysis drastically contradicted the WHO’s statement that a laboratory leak was unlikely. The Bayesian analysis concluded “beyond reasonable doubt” that SARS-Cov-2 “is not a natural zoonosis” but was instead “laboratory derived.” The analysis, obtained by The Published Reporter, was released on January 27 by Steven Carl, Quay MD Phd.

READ THE FULL STORY: Two Dozen Scientists Pen Open Letter Demanding New International Inquiry Into Origin Of SARS-CoV-2 As Bayesian Analysis Points To Lab-Creation

Bayesian analysis
The 193-page paper entitled “A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory-derived” can be downloaded from Zenodo, a general-purpose open-access repository operated by CERN, here:

You may also like

Page 1 of 2
Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to [email protected] and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)

Comments are closed.