ACLU’s Support for Trump in Jan. 6 Gag Order Battle Denied by Judge

974

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been denied the opportunity to weigh in on the matter of a federal judge’s gag order imposed on former President Donald Trump. 

The ACLU, known for its unwavering commitment to civil rights, had sought permission to argue that the gag order issued by US District Judge Tanya Chutkan in the criminal case against Trump was unconstitutional.

Despite having filed 400 legal actions against the Trump administration in the past, the ACLU faced a surprising setback when they requested permission to address the constitutionality of the gag order. 

On Tuesday, Judge Chutkan denied the ACLU’s request, stating that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Local Criminal Rules did not allow for the filing of amicus curiae briefs in this case.

Judge Chutkan issued a gag order that prevented Trump from publicly making statements or instructing others to do so if those statements were aimed at specific parties involved in the case. 

These parties include the Special Counsel prosecuting the case, defense counsel, court staff, and potential witnesses. 

aclus-support-trump-jan-6-gag-order-battle-denied-judge
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been denied the opportunity to weigh in on the matter of a federal judge’s gag order imposed on former President Donald Trump.

The ACLU argued that the order was overly broad and lacked sufficient explanation, particularly pointing to the term “target” as unconstitutionally vague and needing clarification.

In their would-be brief, the ACLU emphasized that while Trump had made numerous statements that were false and harmful to individuals and the nation, he still retained his First Amendment right to speak. 

The organization stressed the importance of upholding the right to free speech, even in the face of criminal charges.

The ACLU clarified that they did not seek to have the gag order completely lifted but rather narrowed it to avoid any infringement on the First Amendment right to free speech. 

They highlighted their desire to balance the need for a fair trial and the protection of fundamental constitutional rights.

While the ACLU faces this recent setback, its commitment to safeguarding civil liberties and defending the principles of free speech remains unwavering.

Representatives from the ACLU have chosen not to comment on Judge Chutkan’s ruling, leaving the legal battle surrounding Donald Trump’s criminal case and the boundaries of free speech to continue evolving.

Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to [email protected] and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)


Comments are closed.