ICE Issues New Guidance on Prosecutorial Discretion; How Will It Affect Latinos and Others in Deportation Proceedings?

File photo: Savvapanf Photo, Shutter Stock, licensed.
Regardless of status, most Latinos, like most Americans, believe that he immigration system is broken.  According to one poll, the vast majority of Latinos believe that the U.S. immigration system needs major changes or a complete rebuild. File photo: Savvapanf Photo, Shutter Stock, licensed.

CLEVELAND, OH – There are now approximately eight million undocumented Latinos in the U.S.: five million people from Mexico, 1.9 million from Central America, and 800,000 from South America. Americans often misinterpret these numbers and jump to the absurd conclusion that a large portion of the Latino population is undocumented. In fact, only 13% of the 62 million Latino population is undocumented in the U.S.  

Yet, regardless of status, most Latinos, like most Americans, believe that he immigration system is broken.  According to one poll, the vast majority of Latinos believe that the U.S. immigration system needs major changes or a complete rebuild.

That change has been slow in coming. 

While the Biden Administration has significantly curtailed the arrest and deportation of immigrants who are the U.S. without  authorization and do not have criminal convictions, the fact remains that 1.7 million pending cases in removal proceedings are clogging the immigration courts across the country. 


FREE DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION: GET ONLY 'FEATURED' STORIES BY EMAIL

Big Tech is using a content filtering system for online censorship. Watch our short video about NewsGuard to learn how they control the narrative for the Lamestream Media and help keep you in the dark. NewsGuard works with Big-Tech to make it harder for you to find certain content they feel is 'missing context' or stories their editors deem "not in your best interest" - regardless of whether they are true and/or factually accurate. They also work with payment processors and ad-networks to cut off revenue streams to publications they rate poorly by their same bias standards. This should be criminal in America. You can bypass this third-world nonsense by signing up for featured stories by email and get the good stuff delivered right to your inbox.
 

These cases have accumulated over the years, dating back to Trump, Obama, and even George W. Bush. 

One thing is clear:  the current immigration court system is unsustainable, unable to provide protect the due process rights of immigrants and their families, and represents a massive waste of scarce government resources.

Instead of leveraging our tax dollars to target and deport hardened criminals, drug dealers, and violent predators, we are spending billions on a deportation system that is focused on peaceful individuals, many of whom are married to American citizens, have U.S. citizen children, and own homes and businesses. 

Their biggest crime? They don’t have papers. 

The following numbers represent some of the nationalities currently represented in removal proceedings in immigration courts across the country:

  • Honduras         317,000
  • Guatemala       315,153
  • Mexico            206,192
  • El Salvador      193,786
  • Venezuela        116,718
  • Brazil                84,105
  • Nicaragua          82,698
  • Cuba                  74,635
  • Ecuador              56,654
  • Colombia           32,753
  • Peru                   11,099
  • Dom Republic      6,233
  • Chile                    4,703

The negative impact felt by the families and the community can not be ignored. 

In prior generations, Congress has viewed the undocumented issue from a different perspective. From the 1980s all the way until 2001, there were laws that provided a path to legal status. By paying a fine for the civil infraction of not having immigration status, immigrants could come out of the shadows, get fingerprinted, and obtain a green card — often through family or employer sponsorship. 

For the last 21 years, due to the political benefits of riding the wave of xenophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment, Congress has refused to pass legislation to provide a path to legal status. 

This has created a crisis in our immigration court system, which is incredibly dysfunctional and hearing dates are often pushed out years down the road, while families live in fear that they may never get due process and the opportunity to stay.

There may be relief ahead.

On April 3, 2022, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) Kerry E. Doyle issued new guidelines for its attorneys regarding prosecutorial discretion.

The memorandum titled Guidance to OPLA Attorneys Regarding the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Laws and the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion (Doyle Memorandum) will be effective from 25th April 2022. This memo is consistent with the memorandum titled Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law issued on 30th September 2021 and took effect on 29th November 2021, issued by Department of Homeland Security Alejandro Majorkas (Mayorkas Memorandum).

The new memo provides a strong directive by the Biden administration to ICE attorneys that they must follow the time-honored tradition within the law that prosecutors should “do justice” — and prioritize scarce government resources in a way that maximizes public safety. The new memo updates and expands the exercise of prosecutorial discretion by ICE attorneys. The Doyle Memo streamlines ICE process for designating enforcement priorities and provides greater discretion to ICE attorneys to exercise various forms of prosecutorial discretion in individual cases.

What is Prosecutorial Discretion?

An immigration prosecutor has the authority to make a decision regarding placing a person in immigration court and charging them with removability, or even terminating an existing deportation case.  This is called prosecutorial discretion.

Prosecutorial Discretion is a wide range of authority that even allows offering plea bargains to a defendant. For example, a law enforcement officer gives you a warning for speeding and lets you go while they can charge you.

ICE is the representative of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the United States Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). Moreover, the OPLA has the power to use prosecutorial discretion. The OPLA attorneys can decide how they want to proceed and which cases to focus on. For instance, they can agree to remove a case from the immigration court through administrative closure or dismissal.

How Does PD Work?

OPLA lawyers assess your cases independently to decide whether they should use PD or not. Moreover, you can submit a request for PD. Once they receive your submission, they calculate if it is an enforcement priority using the Mayorkas and the Doyle Memoranda.

OPLA reviews the data of your case and considers all the factors to decide about the priority.

Should You Apply for PD?

Nonpriority Cases

Firstly, OPLA evaluates if your case is a priority for enforcement or not. If it is a nonpriority case, OPLA is highly likely to use PD such as not filing the Notice to Appear (NTA). For instance, if they have filed NTA already, OPLA will use PD by dismissing the removal proceedings without prejudice.

Depending on the case, they may opt for requests for relief, waiving appeal, a reduced bond amount, administrative closure, and other methods.

Priority Cases

When OPLA evaluates that your case is a priority for enforcement, they don’t use PD and refuse to apply for NTA, termination, administrative closure, or dismissal.

In some cases, OPLA still uses PD if your case is a priority. In addition, you can provide evidence to change the status of priority. OPLA lawyers can independently reevaluate your case if they get new information. If they change the priority status, they may support your PD request.

The Civil Immigration Enforcement Priorities

For civil immigration enforcement, the Mayorkas Memorandum has defined three priorities. OPLA attorneys are asked to use their resources on noncitizens that are a threat to border security, public safety, or national security.

In this section, we will talk about these three priorities. Moreover, we will share how OPLA attorneys determine priorities.

The Mayorkas Memorandum Priorities

File photo: Zimmytws, Shutter Stock, licensed.

Let’s talk about three priorities of the Mayorkas Memorandum:

  1. Threat to National Security

Noncitizens who are suspected or involved in espionage or terrorism-related activities are a priority. Moreover, people who are dangerous to national security also come under this priority.

  • Threat to Public Safety

Noncitizens that are involved in criminal activities are a threat to public safety. Hence they are a priority for removal. When they pose a threat to the public, they are not determined with bright categories. Instead, it requires a detailed analysis of the circumstances and the conduct of the individual.

  • Threat to Border Security

When a noncitizen is dangerous to border security, they will be considered a priority for removal. They are considered a threat when:

  • They are captured at the port or border of the United States while trying to enter illegally.
  • They are captured in the United States and they entered the country after 1st November 2020.

In addition, there may be some other scenarios that ask law enforcement agencies to remove the person. Depending on the facts and circumstances, there may be some favor for an individual case.

The Bottom Line

The latest guidelines of ICE are welcomed by the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). The memo will allow prosecutors to resolve cases immediately. It will help in reducing the backlog in immigration court proceedings. Thousands of people are waiting in line for years to get asylum or a green card. The Doyle Memorandum offers clear guidelines for prosecutors.

In the past, ICE Prosecutors have not always closely adhered to PD memos issued by OPLA.  In addition, federal courts have, at times, intervened and enjoined prosecutorial discretion policies by ICE. 

But one thing is clear.  With nearly 1.7 million cases currently pending in immigration courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals, let’s hope that ICE Prosecutors will “do justice,” conserve scarce administrative resources best used against high priority cases, and remove low priority cases from the deportation process.  This will not only make the U.S. a more safe and equitable nation, but will help keep peaceful and hardworking families together.   

On May 12, 2022, ICE Principal Legal Advisor Kerry Doyle and ICE Detroit Chief Counsel Tara Harris will hold a community meeting with interested legal services providers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and community stakeholders who work with immigrant communities in Michigan and Ohio. 

This meeting presents a unique opportunity to hear directly from PLA Doyle on her recently issued guidance to ICE attorneys on enforcing the civil immigration laws and prosecutorial discretion.  It is anticipated that specific guidance on process will be provided. 

For more information on how to submit a request for PD, please see the ICE Website.


Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to corrections@publishedreporter.com and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)