ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

New York Times Reports CDC “Greatly Exaggerated” Risk of Outdoor COVID-19 Transmission; 10% Believed to be Closer To 1% Or Less

The Times reports that the 10 percent outdoor transmission estimate was a result of the CDC misclassifying transmission incidents that had taken place at several Singapore-based construction sites that may have actually occurred indoors instead, or in a mix of indoor and outdoor locations, such as buildings that were in the process of development.
According to the NYT, the 10 percent outdoor transmission estimate was a result of the CDC misclassifying transmission incidents that had taken place at several Singapore-based construction sites that may have actually occurred indoors instead. Photo credit ShutterStock.com, licensed.

NEW YORK, NY – According to a new report by the New York Times, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) greatly exaggerated the chance of catching COVID-19 when outdoors, initially claiming that the virus had a 10 percent transmission rate when in fact that number is closer to 1 percent or less.

The Times reports that the 10 percent outdoor transmission estimate was a result of the CDC misclassifying transmission incidents that had taken place at several Singapore-based construction sites that may have actually occurred indoors instead, or in a mix of indoor and outdoor locations, such as buildings that were in the process of development.

The cases of COVID-19 transmission at the Singapore construction sites adds up to much less than 10 percent, the Times said; instead it was closer to one percent or less.

The CDC has used this inaccurate transmission estimate as a basis for people to continue wearing masks in certain outdoor settings, even if they have been vaccinated, the Times said.


FREE DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION: GET ONLY 'FEATURED' STORIES BY EMAIL

Big Tech is using a content filtering system for online censorship. Watch our short video about NewsGuard to learn how they control the narrative for the Lamestream Media and help keep you in the dark. NewsGuard works with Big-Tech to make it harder for you to find certain content they feel is 'missing context' or stories their editors deem "not in your best interest" - regardless of whether they are true and/or factually accurate. They also work with payment processors and ad-networks to cut off revenue streams to publications they rate poorly by their same bias standards. This should be criminal in America. You can bypass this third-world nonsense by signing up for featured stories by email and get the good stuff delivered right to your inbox.
 

In a Senate committee hearing on Tuesday, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky was questioned by Senator Susan Collins, (R-ME) in regards to the findings in the Times’ report and how they conflicted with guidance that the CDC has issued in regards to the reopening of schools and businesses.

LIVE: ANTHONY FAUCI, ROCHELLE WALENSKY TESTIFY TO SENATE PANEL ON FIGHT AGAINST COVID-19

Walensky defended herself, claiming that the 10 percent outdoor transmission estimate was taken from a study that the Journal of Infectious Disease published in November 2020.

A response by a CDC official was quoted in the Times’ report, who said that the medical community still has limited data on outdoor transmission.

“The data we do have supports the hypothesis that the risk of outdoor transmission is low. 10 percent is a conservative estimate from a recent systematic review of peer-reviewed papers,” the official said. “CDC cannot provide the specific risk level for every activity in every community and errs on the side of protection when it comes to recommending steps to protect health. It is important for people and communities to consider their own situations and risks and to take appropriate steps to protect their health.”


Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to corrections@publishedreporter.com and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)