ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Major Environmental Review Law Under Attack

Proposed changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) would restrict review of long-term environmental impacts on major federal projects like pipelines and dams. File photo: Pixabay.

NEW YORK — Environmental groups testified this week in opposition to proposals they say would drastically weaken a critical law that protects communities as well as wildlife.

For 50 years, the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, has given the public a chance to weigh in on major federal projects such as roads, bridges and pipelines that have an impact on their health and safety.

But Jessie Ritter, director of water resources and coastal policy at the National Wildlife Federation, says changes proposed by the Trump administration would limit the number of projects that would be reviewed, and restrict the types of impacts that can be evaluated, including long-term impacts.

“It removes the impetus for us to think about how any new federal projects are resilient in the face of things like changing seas and a changing climate, and increased natural hazards,” she points out.


FREE DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION: GET ONLY 'FEATURED' STORIES BY EMAIL

Big Tech is using a content filtering system for online censorship. Watch our short video about NewsGuard to learn how they control the narrative for the Lamestream Media and help keep you in the dark. NewsGuard works with Big-Tech to make it harder for you to find certain content they feel is 'missing context' or stories their editors deem "not in your best interest" - regardless of whether they are true and/or factually accurate. They also work with payment processors and ad-networks to cut off revenue streams to publications they rate poorly by their same bias standards. This should be criminal in America. You can bypass this third-world nonsense by signing up for featured stories by email and get the good stuff delivered right to your inbox.
 

The administration maintains changing NEPA would reduce paperwork and delays on major projects. The public comment period on the changes ends on March 10.

Ritter points out that under the proposed changes, federal agencies would no longer have to do any new scientific research on the potential environmental impact of a project.

“It actually allows project applicants to write their own environmental reviews, without any conflict-of-interest safeguards,” she states.

Ritter adds the changes also would require any public comments to include more detailed, technical analysis of a project’s potential adverse impacts.

Ritter says NEPA has served as the foundation of reasonable and balanced protections, for communities and for the environment, since it was enacted in 1978.

“It’s about transparency and good governance, and it’s about science-based decision making and considering the full implications before we take action,” she states. “It’s just common sense.”

Ritter says if the federal Council on Environmental Quality goes forward with the proposed changes, they will be challenged in court.


Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to corrections@publishedreporter.com and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)