Democrat Shills’ “Overwhelming Evidence” Not So “Overwhelming” After All

It seems the “overwhelming evidence” that the Democrats presented to the Senate was not so “overwhelming” after all. Theee “shills” in the form of Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler, are going to be shown to be the phonies they are in pushing this senseless impeachment charge against all rational thinking. Photo credit: C-SPAN.

DELRAY BEACH, FL – Why are the feckless Democrats demanding new evidence to be presented in the phony impeachment process, when they claim that the “overwhelming evidence” they have already produced in the House is enough to convict the president?

Can you imagine impeaching a president over an innocuous phone call with another president of another country? Does carrying the moniker of Democrat mean that you have lost all your common sense?  If their evidence is so “overwhelming”, why, then, do they need more?

The Republicans should not be sucked into trying to answer all the lies that the Democrats throw at them in trying to justify impeaching the president.  The Articles of Impeachment, sent to the Senate for trial, contain two counts that do not reach the level of “high crimes and misdemeanors” set forth in the Constitution. For months leading up to the actual vote in the House of Representatives for impeachment, the “loser” Democrats were using words like bribery, extortion, “quid pro quo” and attack on the Constitution, to charge what the president supposedly engaged in for doing those activities.  Those were actual crimes, but, in the end, they couldn’t prove those outrageous false charges so they settled for “Abuse of Power” and “Obstruction of Congress”, both non-crimes.

The trial in the Senate, after hearing the charges put forth by the House of Representatives, should declare the Articles do not meet the criteria of what the Constitution states as reasons for impeaching a public official (in this case the President of the United States).


Big Tech is using a content filtering system for online censorship. Watch our short video about NewsGuard to learn how they control the narrative for the Lamestream Media and help keep you in the dark. NewsGuard works with Big-Tech to make it harder for you to find certain content they feel is 'missing context' or stories their editors deem "not in your best interest" - regardless of whether they are true and/or factually accurate. They also work with payment processors and ad-networks to cut off revenue streams to publications they rate poorly by their same bias standards. This should be criminal in America. You can bypass this third-world nonsense by signing up for featured stories by email and get the good stuff delivered right to your inbox.

When the president is found “not guilty” in the Senate (no way will 2/3’s of the Senate vote for conviction), some think that that the  Democrat-controlled House will not accept the Senate’s decision by offering up more new senseless crimes to hang around the president’s neck, and start another impeachment process. Their hatred is so intense that they can’t think straight and will attempt another “bite of the apple”.  That’s how out of control they are when it comes to dealing with President Trump. They realize that the re-election of the president is a near sure thing.

Think of all the wasted time, effort, and money that has been expended on this “hoax” impeachment. Instead of doing the people’s work by addressing the problems of the country, the Democrats will continue on their vendetta against the president in trying to undo the results of the 2016 election.

It seems the “overwhelming evidence” that the Democrats presented to the Senate was not so “overwhelming” after all. The Democrat “shills” in the form of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Jerrold Nadler, are going to be shown to be the phonies that they are in pushing this senseless impeachment charge against all rational thinking. The quicker they shoot down this sham persecution, the better off we all will be.

Comment via Facebook

Corrections: If you are aware of an inaccuracy or would like to report a correction, we would like to know about it. Please consider sending an email to and cite any sources if available. Thank you. (Policy)