Trump Political Consultant Roger Stone Spared Jail Time; Judge Issues “Total Ban” from All Social Media After Violating Gag Order

Republican strategist and former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone as he talked about the Trump presidency as well as his book on politics, Stone’s Rules: How to Win at Politics, Business, and Style. JUNE 17, 2018, File photo: C-SPAN.

WASHINGTON – Roger Stone narrowly avoided going to jail or losing his $250,000 bail bond after a federal judge ruled this week that he violated the terms of a gag order issued against him during his criminal case. But nonetheless, Stone – a famed political consultant, author, lobbyist and strategist – is being forced to endure punishment of a different sort- a total ban from all social media.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson admonished Stone during a hearing held in Washington, D.C., noting a series of Instagram posts that she claimed violated an order imposed upon Stone not to speak in public about his ongoing case related to the Robert Mueller investigation into Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election.

Stone was arrested by FBI agents at his Florida home on January 25, 2019, and charged with obstruction, making false statements to prosecutors, and witness tampering. Stone has pleaded not guilty.

Stay connected with The Published Reporter® - like/follow us: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter - thank you!

Jackson forbade Stone, 66, a longtime friend of President Trump who served as a consultant for his 2016 election campaign, from posting on any social media websites, including Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. Previously Stone was only banned from posting about his case on social media. 

Despite greatly increasing the severity of the gag order – originally imposed to avoid prejudicing potential jurors following a Stone media blitz – Jackson nonetheless stopped short of revoking Stone’s bail, which would have seen him jailed pending his upcoming trial, scheduled for November. 

Stone’s lawyers argued that while Stone was indeed making public comments about the case against him on social media, he did so in a manner that would not have affected the case in any way. In addition, they decried the fairness of Stone being preventing from making any public statements on the case in the face of numerous articles which are considered “hostile” to Stone in the media. 

Comment via Facebook

Disclaimer: News articles on this site contain opinions of the author, and if opinion, may not necessarily reflect the views of the site itself or the views of the owners of The Published Reporter®. Any charges are accusations and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. For more information on our editorial policies please view our editorial policies and fact checking policies, in addition to our terms of service.