Rob Bishop Bashes Democrats For Ignoring House Rules To Hold Hearings On Climate Change; Emerges as Leader in Opposition to Green New Deal

Utah Rep. Rob Bishop recently joined members of the Western Caucus at a public forum on the Green New Deal where he ate a hamburger in defiance of the sweeping proposal that’s backed by Democratic presidential candidates.Photo: House Committee on Natural Resources, Twitter.

WASHINGTON – The top Republican on the House Committee on Natural Resources called out the Democratic majority for pretty much only holding hearings on climate change in 2019, which they argue aren’t within their committee’s jurisdiction and waste time and resources.

“To date, the Committee has held over 13 1/2 hours of hearings with 35 witnesses,” Utah Rep. Rob Bishop, the committee’s ranking Republican, wrote in a letter to Democratic Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva, the committee’s chairman.

Grijalva and other Democratic committee chairs promised to hold hearings focused on climate change. To date, the Democratic-controlled House has held at least 14 climate change hearings, ranging from science to policy proposals.

Natural resource committee Democrats seem to have held more climate change hearings than any other committee — seven of nine hearings to date have focused on climate change.

Stay connected with The Published Reporter® - like/follow us: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter - thank you!

Bishop and other Republicans have criticized Grijalva’s climate obsession since the first committee hearing in early February, questioning whether or not the issue was within the committees’ jurisdiction.

“Many of the Majority witnesses has proposed that the United states undertake a radical transformation to combat climate change, with seemingly no regard to the impact on the economy, jobs, or energy prices,” Bishop wrote.

One Democratic witness was a 16-year-old who founded an anti-capitalist environmental group. Nadia Nazar, the 16-year-old activist, told the committee that “climate change is violating my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

Republicans were able to adjourn Democrats’ most recent climate hearing, which focused on the so-called “denial playbook.” Not enough Democrats attended the hearing, so Republicans were able to out-vote them and shut the hearing down, arguing it was outside their jurisdiction.

In fact, Democrats invited a former NFL player and former opioid addict to testify — neither of their testimonies even mentioned climate change.

Bishop also criticized Democrats holding hearings outside the natural resources committees’ jurisdiction, as laid out in House rules, and their failure to issue public memorandum for most hearings this year.

“We need to make efficient use of the Committee’s limited time and resources by holding hearings within our jurisdiction, inviting witnesses relevant to our subject matter, and operating with transparency,” Bishop wrote.

“Such transparency will no doubt lead to better testimony from the witnesses, participation by the Members, and understanding by the press and American people,” Bishop added.

Bishop has emerged as a leader in the opposition to the Green New Deal resolution, which Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced in February. Bishop recently joined members of the Western Caucus at a public forum on the Green New Deal where he ate a hamburger in defiance of the sweeping proposal that’s backed by Democratic presidential candidates.

“The important question facing the Committee is not whether we are all going to die in 12 years if we continue to eat hamburgers. We won’t,” Bishop wrote in his letter to Grijalva.

Follow Michael on Twitter

Comment via Facebook

Disclaimer: News articles on this site contain opinions of the author, and if opinion, may not necessarily reflect the views of the site itself or the views of the owners of The Published Reporter®. Any charges are accusations and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. For more information on our editorial policies please view our editorial policies and fact checking policies, in addition to our terms of service.